How Green is Your Base station?
Peter Kenington, Technical Chair
- OBSAI
Up
until recently, the term ‘green’, when applied to an organisation
or an individual, would have brought to mind characteristics such as
naivety or inexperience (as in: ”you’ll have to forgive
him, he’s a bit green”). In the environmentally conscious
age in which we now live, being seen as ‘green’ is the
height of praise for an organisation and most now strive to be seen
as such by their customers. In the communications sector, it
is necessary to be every bit as vigilant as in higher-profile carbon-emitting
industries, such as transport or power generation, if the mobile operators
are to be seen to play their part in tackling these environmental issues. Base-station
efficiency, in particular, has been the subject of much recent debate
in the industry – not least amongst the operators, who are increasingly
conscious of their environmental impact and the emphasis placed upon
this by lobby groups and consumers.
One
example of this trend is the substantial part of operator O2’s
website which is dedicated to the environment, environment issues and
climate change – this would not have been the case a few years
ago. You probably knew, for example, that phone chargers use
electricity even when they’re not connected to a mobile phone,
however you probably didn’t know that the impact of this laziness
or carelessness is an additional 50,000 tonnes of CO2 each year in
the UK alone[1]? O2 are not the only operator to be
concerned for the environment and this concern is being reflected more
widely across the mobile industry.
Environmental
concerns are increasingly evident in an operator’s procurement
policy for its base-station equipment: energy efficiency has
gone from a largely ‘don’t care’
issue to one of great importance; likewise for base-station size and
consequently the amount of material used in its manufacture.
One
significant enabler in this area is the advent of open standards for
base-station equipment and the OBSAI (Open Base-Station Architecture
Initiative) standard in particular. In defining an interface
at digital baseband, between the baseband card and the RF transceiver
module in a base-station (known as the ‘RP3’ interface),
OBSAI has enabled a new generation of power-efficient modules to be
created. Perhaps more importantly, it has opened up free market
competition in the RF module area and this is helping to drive up efficiencies
and thereby to drive down power consumption and the overall carbon
footprint of a base-station transceiver system (BTS).
Techniques such as digital predistortion have now largely replaced feedforward
in modern base-stations and this has been enabled by OBSAI’s adoption
of a digital baseband, rather than an analogue RF, interface to an RF
module; digital predistortion is typically more efficient than feedforward
as a method of meeting the required spectral emissions requirements in
a transmitter.
Improving
power efficiency has a number of knock-on environmental benefits for
the base-station as a whole. Improved efficiency leads to a removal
of the need for air-conditioning systems, which further reduces power
consumption.
Improved
efficiency also leads to a reduction in the battery back-up requirement.
Together these reduce or eliminate the need for some environmentally-unfriendly
materials, such as refrigerant gasses, lead and sulphuric acid.
Finally,
a BTS with a reduced battery size, smaller heatsinks, fewer fans and
no air-conditioning is physically smaller and requires fewer materials
to construct and house. This helps to reduce costs as well as
having obvious environmental benefits.
To
give some idea of the environmental benefits of improved BTS efficiency,
Nokia Siemens Networks recently released details of the environmental
benefits of their Flexi BTS family, which utilises OBSAI interfaces
internally. When compared with typical previous-generation WCDMA
base-stations, the power reduction claimed for the Flexi BTS
is 60%. Based on the number of WCDMA base-stations installed
globally by the end of 2005 and a typical usage pattern over 24 hours,
this corresponds to an annual saving of 230MW. This translates to an
annual reduction in CO2 emissions of 740,000 tons. A further
60,000 tons of CO2 is estimated to be saved from reductions in air-freight,
through the 80% reduction in weight of the Flexi product.
So
what will happen next? The use of a digital interface will continue
to be a key enabler for efficiency-enhancing improvements in the transceiver
space. It will allow, for example, switching transmitter and
RF synthesis techniques to be employed; both of these would be far
more cumbersome (and less competitive) if they had to be implemented
as RF-input/output systems. The influence of OBSAI on this aspect
of the marketplace, and on power efficiency in particular, will therefore
be felt well into the future. If the term ‘green’ does
retain its original (non-colour) meaning in the future, it will increasingly
be applied to companies and individuals who do not embrace environmental
issues –
it is they that will be deemed naïve in the new commercial landscape.
Peter Kenington is the Managing Director of Linear Communications Consultants
Ltd. and the Technical Chair of OBSAI. He can be reached at:
pbk@linearcomms.com